X-Ray Diffraction
Experiment 1

Diffraction: Light by Spherulitic Bands/Human Hair/and Diffraction Gratings

OBJECTIVE:

To demonstrate Bragg's law using laser light as a source and spherulitic bands in polymer crystals as the lattice. Optical diffraction from a human hair and a diffraction grating will also be explored. The objective is to 1) gain an understanding of the relationship between structural size and scattering angle, 2) distinguish between scattering from correlations (spatially repeating structure) and scattering from independent structures, 3)  to gain an understanding of the relationship between orientation in a structure and orientation in the scattering or diffraction pattern.

 BACKGROUND: (R. J. Young pp. 261-263; D. C. Bassett, "Principles of Polymer Morphology" pp. 20 to 24; Schultz, "Polymer Materials Science"; Billimeyer "Polymer Science", A serious look at light scattering from hair, light scattering from monodisperse spheres)

Light, x-rays and neutrons interact with structures partly by reradiating isotropically (in all directions) radiation of the same wavelength (elastic scattering).  These scattered waves can interact constructively or destructively to produce a pattern of high and low intensity regions as as function of the scattering or diffraction angle.  Interference can occur from waves scattered from different parts of the same object, i.e. a human hair in this lab, or they can interfere when they are scattered from separate structures which are correlated in space such as atoms in a crystal for x-rays and neutrons or from the lines of an optical grating or bands in a spherulite (discussed below).  The two sources of scattering, structural form (giving rise to the form factor) and structural organization or correlation (the structure factor) are not independent and must be convoluted in calculations of diffraction or scattering patterns.  For both form and structure factors the orientation of the object in real space is related to the orientation seen in the scattering by a 90 degree offset about the incident beam.  This is similar to the relationship between a reflected beam and a surface, that is diffracted/scattered light and x-rays follow the structural normals in terms of orientation.  There is a one to one relationship between structure and scattering so that a distribution of structural orientation leads to a distribution in orientation of the diffraction pattern. 

For both form and structure factors there is an inverse relationship between structural size and the spacing or position in angle of the scattered or diffracted radiation.  That is, large structures are seen as small angles relative to the incident beam and small structures are seen at high angles.  So diffraction from atomic planes or scattering from individual atoms are seen in the diffraction regime with the diffraction angle larger than 6 degrees, while colloidal and nano-scale features are seen at angles far below 6 degrees for x-rays of wavelength close to 0.1 nm.  This inverse relationship between structural size and scattering angle is reflected in Bragg's law that relates a structural repeat distance, d, with the angle of scattering or diffraction, 2q, where for small angle sin(q) ~ q in radians.

Spherulites:  Polymers with a high degree of crystallinity, such as high density polyethylene, form spherical crystalline aggregates when melt crystallized. These spherulites are usually on the order of 10 to 50 micron in diameter but are known to grow much larger in certain cases particularly in melt crystallized polyesters. The base crystalline structures in spherulites (as in all polymer crystals) are lamellar platelets. Polymers crystallize in platelets because of an energy balance between the difference in crystallite surface energy between lateral surfaces, where folding of the chains does not occur, the broader fold surfaces and the bulk enthalpy of crystallization. Spherulites are composed of fibrillar lamellar bundles which grow from a nucleation site in the melt. In some cases, especially in polyesters, polymer spherulites form bands which have been related to coordinated crystallite growth at periodic spacings form the nucleation site. A band is a small region of coordinated and more perfect crystalline growth. The exact mechanism for banding in spherulitic growth is not known but it has been observed in inorganic crystals, minerals (agate), and in certain eutectic alloys in metals as well as being widely seen in polymer and some low-molecular weight organic crystallites.

The feature of spherulitic bands important to this lab is their regular spacing about the crystalline nucleus and constant spacing through out the sample. When spherulites which display bands on the order of 50µm (these are in very large spherulites) are irradiated with collimated, monochromatic laser light (HeNe l = 0.6328 µm), Bragg diffraction occurs due to the difference in polarizability (index of refraction) between the more perfect crystalline structure in the band and the less perfect structure in the remainder of the spherulitic crystalline aggregate. Several orders of diffraction can be observed in some cases (up to 6 orders). This will be verified by comparing the d-spacing according to Bragg's law with observation of these spherulitic bands using optical microscopes. (Note: Usually spherulites are described as 3-d spheres but in this experiment a thin film is used where the "spherulites" are really disks.)

APPROACH:

Each group will be given a thin sample of a 50:50 blend of isotactic polyhydroxybutryate (PHB) and atactic PHB. This system displays band spacings on the order of 50 µm. By shining a laser beam through the sample diffraction rings can be observed. (Note: isotactic PHB crystallizes, atactic PHB doesn't.) The presence of the non-crystallizing atactic PHB enhances banding. Optical diffraction from a human hair and a diffraction grating will also be investigated.

EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES:

1) Banded spherulitic PHB samples between glass cover slips. BE CAREFUL TO HOLD THE SAMPLES ONLY BY THEIR EDGES SO FINGERPRINTS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXPERIMENT.

2.) HeNe Laser. DO NOT SHINE THE LASER BEAM DIRECTLY AT YOUR EYE. BE CAREFUL OF STRAY REFLECTIONS FROM THE SAMPLE.

3.) A pinhole (100 micron pinhole from Newport Analytical for instance or you may want to try to use a sheet of white cardboard with a hole punched in the middle for transmission of the main beam. )

4.) Optical microscope with grid for size measurement.

5.) Two chemistry mounts to hold the sample and the cardboard.

6.) Ruler and pencil.

7.) Human hair (there should be an ample supply in the lab).

8.) Optical diffraction grating.

PROCEDURE:

1.) Place the polymer film in the laser beam and observe the optical diffraction pattern using the white cardboard. Move the sample around and note how the pattern changes.

2.) Find a position where fairly complete rings are observed and trace the rings on the white cardboard. Record the distance from the sample to the cardboard.

3.) Repeat 2 for another position in the sample where the diffraction rings are of different diameter.

4.) Observe the sample in the optical microscope. Measure several band spacings (at least 10). Also record the maximum and minimum band spacings.

5.) Observe the spherulites under crossed polars and note their appearance.

6.) Repeat experiment for several human hairs of different color and coarseness and for the diffraction grating.

RESULTS:

1.) Calculate the diffraction angle, 2q, using the sample to cardboard distance and the ring radius.

2.) Use Bragg's law to calculate the d-spacing for the diffraction ring.

3.) If higher order rings are observed repeat 3 and 4 with "n" in Bragg's law equal to the integer order of reflection.

4.) Using the microscopy data calculate a mean and standard deviation for the band spacing.

5.) Do a similar analysis for human hair and a diffraction grating.

REPORT:

The report should include all of the data measured in this experiment and the calculations done above. Also answer these questions and given any relevant comments concerning the experiment.

1.) How do the band spacings observed using microscopy compare with the results using Bragg's law?

2.) As you scan the laser across the sample regions of partial arcs and close to full arcs (rings) are seen in the diffraction pattern. This is because the laser beam does not irradiate the entire spherulite but only a part of the spherulite. It has been noticed that the larger the spherulites the smaller the arcs which are observed. Explain this effect.

3.) Other than partial arcs and whole diffraction rings the diffraction pattern sometimes takes other shapes. Describe these shapes. What might give rise to these shapes?

4.) In most common x-ray diffractometers a line trace through the main beam (across the pattern you observed in 2-d) is taken. Sketch the appearance of such a linear detector pattern for this system.

5.) If partial arcs were observed it would be possible to miss the diffraction rings using a linear detector. How could this be circumvented? How does this relate to the measurement of an oriented sample in XRD using a line beam profile?

6.) Comment on the difference in the type of information which can be obtained using diffraction and microscopy. In a study of banding at different crystallization temperatures which would yield more useful information?

7.) What do the diffraction peaks from human hair correspond to?

8.) How do the diffraction patterns form human hair and the diffraction grating compare with those from the polymer spherulitic bands?